News

Dissecting the Digital Dollar – Extract 2 – Sharing Value

10 February 2017

The Music Managers Forum has long campaigned for a fairer, more transparent music industry that operates in the interest of artists and fans.  We published Dissecting the Digital Dollar parts 1 and 2 to further that aim regarding streaming. Both are available from here. These bite-sized extracts summarise each issue and propose practical courses of action for managers and artists. The second of these extracts will look at Sharing the Value of Digital Deals. Licensing deals done between on-demand streaming services and record companies, music publishers and CMOs are complex involving substantial advances and other payments.


There are 3 elements of a licensing deal with a streaming service – equity, advances and other fees. Managers felt that whatever the legal situation there was an ethical case for rights holders to share in the income from equity stakes (once realised), unrecouped advances (so called breakage) and any fees received that are more than the cost of delivery of that service (such as supplying the music files). In essence all income should be in the royalty pot.

We support the WIN Declaration that requires labels to “account to artists a good-faith pro-rata share of any revenues and other compensation from digital services that stem from the monetisation of recordings but are not attributed to specific recordings or performances”

Furthermore how the share is calculated should be completely transparent. If that were not the case then rights holders might be tempted to cut worse deals in revenue terms in exchange for more equity. Indeed in what is a mature market with monthly accounting some rights holders say that advances are irrelevant and outdated and reduce royalty rates and over complicating accounting.

Actions for Managers/Artists:

  1. Ask your label if they share breakage with artists and, if yes, how it appears on royalty statements.
  2. If Spotify floats on the stock market the 3 majors and the independents (through rights agency Merlin) have equity and will therefore be entitled to cash from the sale of their shares. Support the MMF and FAC in requesting full transparency as to how that money will be shared with artists.
  3. When negotiating deals make sure there are provisions in the contract for sharing of the above points of income and particularly how such a share would be calculated.

 

 

Read also...

MMF & YouTube Music collaborate on a new MMF Hyperdrive programme

29/06/2026

The Music Managers Forum (MMF) and YouTube Music are delighted to unveil Hyperdrive: a new collaboration to fast-track the professional development of talented music managers. 

Find out more

Heatwaves & Live Events: What Managers Need to Know

26/06/2026

With the UK currently experiencing extreme temperatures of up to 40°C, the Music Managers Forum (MMF) has been working with industry partners to provide clarity and guidance for artists and their teams navigating live performances in these conditions.

Find out more

Complete the MMF Annual Member Survey

22/06/2026

We’re inviting all members to complete our Annual Member Survey and share your experiences, challenges, and ideas.

Find out more

Global artists, songwriters, and managers, call for their rights to be respected in AI deals

22/06/2026

A global coalition of artists, songwriters and music managers have issued a warning to the world’s record labels and publishers to stop the misuse of their rights in AI deals.

Find out more
Back to Top